The currrent ruling prince of Ljubljana, knezoškof/archbishop Anton Stres, on Saturday 3rd July 2010, helding commemoration mass for the 'martyr' heroes of Hitler, Mussolini, Pacelli and Wladimir Ledochowsky - notice the Jesuit HIS sign over his (?) heart :
There’s not yet passed a month after the Slovenian Eucharistic congress presided by cardinal Tarcisio Bertone when Slovenian Fascist collaborationist Lojze Grozde (*) was beatified, and you see again the priests blessing their Balkan crusaders of WWII.
Saturday 3rd July, in the usual ritual mass of commemoration (**) held every year in this recurrence, for another time the church of Rome asked to the Slovenian nation to consider the responsible of the heaviest cruelty occurred under the Italian and German occupation of Yugoslavia during WWII as “martyrs”.
In the locality Kren, near the little town of Kočevje, on the well-known mass grave of those 12,000 Fascist collaborationists which were the true right hand of Mussolini and Hitler in Yugoslavia from 1941 to 1945, the archbishop of Ljubljana Anton Stres with arrogant insolence and without to be ashamed told that “there isn't reconciliation without pardoning”.
The church of Rome, through one of his bishops, simply asked to recognize the legitimacy of the operate of those voluntary assassins and that not only as regards the religious sphere, but also for what concerns the political and ideological implication a religious blessing immediately has also inside the secular society. Rome cannot consider herself the true spiritual and political master of the incoming European Roman Catholic “EU” empire without to definitively rehabilitate the actions of that bunch of assassins giving them full moral citizenship in our contemporary world as one of the principal elements among the spiritual and ideological fundamental constituents of the New European Order.
For what reason Rome should refute now herself? When she finally has the entire European continent tight in her hands and completely purged from the historical religious and political enemies, doing so a moral suicide?
Under the mask of the “reconciliation” there's the rehabilitation and the open blessing of all the values, ideologies, political goals, religious finalities and the material bloody actions of those 12,000 Domobranci, Belagarda, Ustasha, (also traitor Orthodox Chetniks ). Those units-of-the-death have been created, controlled, commanded and coordinated with the actions of the occupation troops by the priesthood of Rome. Those priests and bishops were not only the spiritual masters of them, but also the military supreme commanders of them. And were the true source of the bloody religious fanaticism. The same Italian army had to move away from the M.V.A.C. Collaborationist armada (M.V.A.C. was the official Italian name for the Belagarda collaborationist army) a Slovenian Roman Catholic priest member because he openly expressed the intention to purge from the occupied Slovenia anyone who was not Catholic, creating so serious troubles to the same efforts of the Italian occupation forces in their relation with the occupied country. In a bloody showdown two collaborationist Chetniks went killed by members of the fanatical Roman Catholic Slovenian collaborationist fraction headed by that priest, father Frank Glavač.
There was a growing tension in the air, in that May 1945, with the from day-to-day less friendly and more animated by enemy sentiments Western allies. But if those Brits didn't use all those captured thousands of criminals of war like those Belagarda, Domobranci, Ustasha, Chetniks etc. as a form of potential guerrilla threat to increase the military pressure on Tito's post-war regime, a damn reason there should be. Maybe is right Eric John Phelps when he tells us about those Keelhaul-like operations? Or maybe the story contains some shades not considered by him? Maybe the same Western allies wanted a punishment for those bunch of traitors, who, at the beginning were supported by London via the legitime Yugoslav monarchic exiled (and coward) government. Those comical but at the same time sinister characters, suddenly at work in the occupied Yugoslavia after that 6th April, meanwhile pretended to represent the “resistance” against the German and the Italian occupation, at the same time were also openly supporting it, eating also from the Nazi and Fascist plate. Deceiving the same British government. They were not only the typical cardsharpers, a character who, in some situations, could even drag the sympathies of the spectator, but they were also the most cruel assassins of the entire WWII, whose dirty jobs filled that country with an never seen before stream of blood. If even the Fascist occupants were sometimes disgusted by their actions, figure it out the happiness of the British government to find himself, after the end of war, exposed in front of the world public opinion with such a bunch of human beasts in its military camps and presented as “the freedom-fighters of the new war”. Yes, more than a necessity to deprive Yugoslavia of the “patriotic core” (but hasn't been she just deprived with four years of Hell on earth?), it was the necessity to discharge the most infamous product of Satan on earth of the XX century. And a little sense of revenge for years of traitorous double-game. Below, the text and an image of the monument dedicated to the memory of the 'martyrs' at Kren, Kočevje:
"IN THIS LOCATION ARE LYING FROM FOUR TO FIVE THOUSANDS SOLDIERS OF THE SLOVENIAN NATIONAL ARMY SENT BACK FROM VETRINJE BY THE ENGLISHES AND BY THE COMMUNISTS ASSASSINATED IN THE FIRST TEN DAYS OF JUNE 1945.
THEIR NAME AREN'T KNOWN, AS WELL THE PLATOONS WHERE THEY FOUGHT FOR THREE YEARS FOR THE FREEDOM OF THE HOMELAND. THEY FELL IN THIS HOLE WHERE THERE ARE JUST FALLEN MORE THAN A THOUSAND OF SERBIAN AND CROATIAN SOLDIERS.
MAY GOD GIVE THEM ETERNAL PEACE AND QUIET."
Today it is possible to fully appreciate the double face and tongue of the Roman Catholic church. Meanwhile in the near Italian country the Italian Episcopal conference defends the “immigrates” against an “inhuman” government which “imposes” on the immigrates and gypsies “the same racial laws of the Nazi regime”, at the same time in Slovenia, the same church of Rome, through the mouth of another bishop belonging to another Episcopal conference, defends without shame and with determination the spiritual and political actual importance of the historical material collaboration with the National Socialist and Fascist policy of aggression and genocide in the Balkans.
All that should instigate a reflection not only about the true finality of the “policy of welcome” for the immigration (especially the Islamic one; in fact seventy years ago the Muslims were the natural allies of the Fascist invaders of Yugoslavia) the church of Rome exhibit vulgarly in our days. It should indicate what are the true goals of the Holy See, goals which in a country are openly exhibited through nostalgic commemorative masses – in another country are hidden and confused with usurer words of charity towards the immigration: You must kneel to the immigration (especially the Islamic core of it), no more or less the Yugoslav people had to kneel to the aggression Fascist Italian secular arms of the Jesuit order. In any case one message is unequivocal and unavoidable: in the age of the European unification, for the secular authorities of the state there's no else alternative than to be “reconciled” with those “martyrs” and to recognize the moral legitimacy of their ideologies and their bloody operate.
At least if a political actor/clown of today desires to survive in a Roman Catholic ideologically suffocated European theatre/circus.
The only and pure historical truth clearly shows those 12,000 prisoners consigned by the Western allies and then executed by Tito’s security forces from May to June 1945, as members of the militias responsible of horrors which probably were the most cruel crimes occurred in Europe since the end of the Middle Age. The church of Rome is in a trouble as regard an explicit request of “reconciliation”. The memory of the massacre during WWII, massacres which wouldn’t have taken place without the vital support of the native Fascist collaborationism to the occupants, is still too much present in the nations of the former Yugoslavia, and especially in Slovenia. For this reason the church of Rome didn’t invite explicitly any authority of the state at the celebration in Kočevje on 3rd July. The presence of prime minister Borut Pahor and his speech at the blessing of the religious crusade of those 12,000 butchers of Rome was presented to the media as the fruit of a “spontaneous” desire of him and not as the official answer to an official invite by the organs of the church. After having taken part in the Roman Catholic homage to the memory of Belagarda, Domobranci and Ustasha, the prime minister, with an evident intention to foolish his left wing electorate and to throw further sand in the eyes of the public opinion, rendered homage, in locality Turjak, to the memory of 29 members of the Liberator Front there executed by the Slovenian collaborationists on 4th May 1945, when the war was practically ended. Those anti-fascist Slovenian executed hostages – only a little last drop in that ocean of thousands of hostages, prisoners, wounded antifascists slaughtered by those 'martyrs' during the war, were victims of the same collaborationist army before in the same day homaged by the same prime minister! (§)
For a Romanist church which since its beginning has always been re-conciliated with his Lord of the Evil, it is a compulsory action, dictated by weight of all the sins and sufference by that reconciliation generated, that continue, obsessive request to any other human being to follow his example of perdition:
Leftist, "antifascist" Prime Minister Borut Pahor with his ruling prince of Ljubljana, knezoškof/archbishop Anton Stres during the reconciliation with the spiritual heritage of the soldiers of Hitler, Mussolini, Pacelli and Wladimir Ledochowsky:
The treasurer of the bishopric of Novo Mesto, Janez Gril, explained that he received the information about the desire of the prime minister to participate at the commemoration, and for this reason he sent to the second charge of the Slovenian state a formal invite, (at the opposite of the archbishopric of Ljubljana which didn’t send any formal invite to the state authorities). It is evident that the centre-left government of Borut Pahor needs of the charity consisting in an ephemeral and false politic recognition of his government by the church of Rome in exchange of the gradual scrapping of the moral and spiritual heritage of the struggle against the Fascist occupation and their native collaborantionists. The “spontaneity” of the participation of the prime Minister at the commemoration could have been well engineered between representatives of the church and of the government in order to hide the truth, that absolute control the church of Rome has on the Slovenian country and over its highest institutions. The difference with the puppet-Fascist Slovenian state of seventy years ago consists in the fact that today also the leftist and apparently anti-fascist politicians are involved in the management of the Slovenian province of the Intermarium project.
There’s evident that in the media and in every cultural context a criminal distortion and manipulation of history is suppressing the evidence of the real historical facts. A process of collective brainwashing is presented under the guise of the “search for the truth”. The words of archbishop Anton Stres clearly indicate the not-declared War on Truth of Rome:
“The annual commemoration at Kren is commonly labelled as reconcilement. It is not a reconcilement because if this should be, it would have been achieved with a mass twenty years ago (when after the fall of Yugo the first commemoration was held - avles), but for the reason that every mass is leading to it, because the reconcilement which is needed, is not an unique event, but a process, which requires a dedication without conditions to the truth, to the legitimacy and to the pardoning” - (**).
Archbishop Stres told also about the “hundreds and more” mass graves filled with the corpse of those “martyrs” liquidated by Tito’s services in those two fatidical months after the end of war. Those mass graves were obviously not a novely but were announced with great echo in the last decades, when the Holy See’s puppet-state of Slovenia acquired the formal independence from other secular state organizations of the Balkans in order to start the overturning of the history. Archbishop Stres has truly a cheek in to affirm that those hundred and more little or larger mass graves are the product of the “revolution” wanted by Tito’s regime, a regime which in reality was anti-revolutionary, after you see how much convinced Communists and Spanish revolution veterans were imprisoned or even liquidated by him. Archbishop Stres purposely forgets that those Belagarda and Ustasha 'martyrs' where the lowest imaginable layer of the war criminality. An opportune amnesia because those 'martyrs' were the secular hands or, better, tentacles, of his church which used them for the '41-'45 religious purge of the Balkans. That crusade extirpated not only Schismatic Orthodoxies and Jews, but also many Roman Catholics the same whose Christian sentiments didn’t allow to them to passively accept the Fascist traitorous puppet-governments of Zagreb and Ljubljana. Those 'martyrs' went liquidated by Tito absolutely not in the name of a whatever “revolution”, but as consequence of the fact that they committed an act of high treason, supporting a not declared aggression by foreign enemy criminal forces which imposed the martial law in their countries – to not name the sufferance and the deaths.
The shameless church of Rome deliberately dares to manipulate the historical truth using the confusing term “revolution” for the clear reason that even the Yugoslav general commander of the military detachment of Zagreb, who surely was not under suspicion for Communist sympathies and enmity against his Serbian monarchy, in the days after that fateful 6th April 1941, issued the martial law order which imposed to immediately and without any hesitation shoot any collaborationist with the Fascist Italian and Nazi German aggressors. If those orders would have not been sabotaged by the Italian and German fifth column inside the same Yugoslav’s army, doc Natlačen, the head of the ridiculous collaborationist Narodni Svet/National Council of Slovenia, and his master the Fascist collaborationist predecessor of Anton Stres, the archbishop of Ljubljana as well criminal of war Gregorj Rožman, would have been immediately sent in front of a monarchic Yugoslav’s firing squad, at the order of the same Serbian generals who were all deep-rooted anti-communists and defenders of those Fascist dictatorial governments of Orthodox king Alexander, governments supported by the Slovenian (Roman Catholic) Jesuit priest and at the same time leader of the SLS-clerical party of Slovenia, Anton Korošec (***).
Four years after, with the liquidation of those 12,000 collaborationists at Kočevje, Tito simply executed the order of that monarchic general of Zagreb. It is indifferent in this context the presence of other occult finalities and conveniences behind that liquidation en-mass, occult finalities and conveniences which surely existed but didn't change of a micron the here present formal legal question. The differences with the case of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, another case of Roman Catholic terrorist action, are laying also in the fact that in Yugoslavia you had thousands and thousands of John H. Surratt and John Wilkes Booth. Those Surrat & Boothes of Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, were the ones who allowed to the Fascist aggressor to remain undisturbed for years in the occupied Yugoslavia, transforming it in a sub-continental cemetery of 1,600,000 graves. And meanwhile the hostility with the defeat of the Third Reich ended, the inner state of war in Yugoslavia, with sabotages and guerilla, continued after that May 1945.
Was this example total different in the spirit, from what happened in Yugoslavia at the end of WWII?
The execution of the collaborationists of the Jesuit/Holy See which organized the material assassination of Abraham Lincoln, using the ideological hate for religious finalities like it happened later in the Balkan crusade of Rome:
If you think to perceive a sentiment of satisfaction from the words of archbishop Stres in the commemorations of our days, this is not due to a wrong impression. As I told in the first message of this blog, if those criminals would have survived, at that point serious troubles for the same church of Rome would have arisen. After the Croatian Tito executed the martial law orders of those Serbian generals with four years of delay, he liquidated also the evidences of the Roman Catholic religious crusade in the Balkans. The true leaders of Belagarda and Ustasha armadas were the Roman Catholic priests and bishops and hence the Roman Catholic Apostolic church, and it was not convenient to let emerge this truth in trials for war crimes because the consequences would have been far more dangerous than any imaginable previous or foreseeable ideological conflict. Among other finalities, now you know also why the Cold War has been ignited immediately after the end of WWII. So it is not a casual coincidence the fact that the ideology of the final “liquidator” (Tito) of any religious evidence in the Balkan Fascist aggression, was the Materialism dialectic. This ideology denies any importance to the religious sphere in the creation of the history. Discourses on the class war, on the material condition of the proletariat and the economy as “the engine of history” are only a dialectical manipulation of the reality to hide the religious truth of what happened from 1941 to 1945 in the Balkans (and in Eurasia).
After Nazism, Fascism and Communism, it is time to start to repudiate and to condemn as a criminal ideology also the spiritual mother of them, the Roman Catholicism.
Below, the text translated from the original document written in Italian by the Italian military authority of the XI° armed corps in 1943. An image of the original document appears in the page 581 of the work “Belogardizem” of Franček Saje (publishing hous Ciceron). Frank Glavač was the Roman Catholic priest leader of one of the most fanatical and cruel units of Slovenian Fascist collaborationist military army-M.V.A.C., the “group of Glavač”;
(Notes. "Precurie" evidently is an error and obviously is referred to the Slovenian region of the Prekmurje. M.V.A.C. stands for “Milizie Volontarie Anti Comuniste/Anti Communist Voluntary Militia”; after the typewritten text, on the bottom, it appears an hand-written note saying: “the Excellence could mention it to the Bishop as regard the 1° development” and “in the meantime good luck” - the last word and the signature are indecipherable – I follow the style of the original text which has been typewritten in capitals):
"Headquarter of XI° Armed Corps
P.M. 46 - 10th February 1943-XXI°
Memorandum for the Chief of Staff
THE REV. G L A V A Č FRANCO – AT PRESENT SUB EDITOR OF “SLOVENEC” - BORN IN PRECURIE (SLOVENIA AT PRESENT OCCUPIED BY HUNGARY), IS EXPONENT OF AN EXTREME CATHOLIC CURRENT WHICH WOULD AIM TO ELIMINATE WITHOUT SCRUPLES, BOTH FROM THE PUBLIC LIFE AND FROM THE M.V.A.C., ALL THE NOT CATHOLIC ELEMENTS.
IN A RECENT BREAKFAST, TO WHICH THE GLAVAČ PARTICIPATED WITH OTHER 10 YOUNG PRIESTS LIKE HIM, HIS CONDUCT WAS GOING TO GENERATE AN ACCIDENT.
HE IS AN ELEMENT WHOSE PRESENCE IN SLOVENIA COULDN'T BE CONSIDERED IN NO ELSE WAY THAN A SERIOUSLY DANGEROUS ONE FOR US ITALIANS AND THEREFORE IT SHOULD BE URGENT AND NECESSARY HIS REMOVAL WHICH CAN HAPPEN IN TWO WAYS:
1°)- THAT THE BISHOP SHOULD SEND HIM IN PRECURIE.
2°)- THAT AT THE FIRST OCCASION AND WITH ANY EXCUSE AND MEANS HE SHOULD BE MOVED AWAY FROM THE PROVINCE.
PERSONAL PARTICULARITIES : GLAVAČ FRANCESCO MARTINO – CONSCRIPT BORN IN 1913 – IDENTITY CARD 005136 ISSUED BY THE MUNICIPALITY OF LUBIANA= = = = = = = = ="
Wednesday, March 4, 2009 http://adrgegenreformationheute.blogspot.com/2009/03/and-tito-exterminated-extermination.html
(§) Of course I was wrong and Borut Pahor visited the Turjak memorial after having participated to the homages to Belagarda in Kočevje, and not before. Therefore instead to read: "... Before to join .... (....) ..later..", read "...After having taken part in... (...) ... before".
(*) Sunday, June 13, 2010 - Doctor Tarcisio Bertone or "how I learned from the Commies to embalm young collaborationists"
(**) Source: Rtvslo news online site:
"Do dogodkov se še vedno nismo ustrezno opredelili"/”We didn't adeguately face with the events”
Ljudje se na tem mestu že 20 let spominjajo pobojev
4. julij 2010 ob 10:42,
zadnji poseg: 4. julij 2010 ob 14:24
Kočevje - MMC RTV SLO/STA
"Sprave ni brez odpuščanja," je v Kočevskem rogu poudaril ljubljanski nadškof Stres. Premier Pahor pa je prepričan, da je treba graditi na tistem, kar je v narodni preteklosti dobrega.
Ob grobišču pod Krenom v Kočevskem rogu je potekala spravna slovesnost za žrtve revolucionarnega nasilja, ki jo prireja župnija Kočevje. Pred kapelo Božjega usmiljenja ob grobišču so darovali obletno mašo, pri kateri je somaševal ljubljanski nadškof in metropolit Anton Stres.
"Vsakoletno slovesnost pod Krenom navadno imenujejo za spravno. Ni spravna zato, ker bi bila z mašo pred dvajsetimi leti sprava že dosežena, ampak zato, ker vsaka tamkajšnja maša vodi k njej, saj sprava, kakršno potrebujejo, ni enkratno dejanje, temveč proces, ki zahteva brezpogojno privrženost resnici, pravico in odpuščanje," je poudaril v slavnostnem govoru.
"Sočutja ni bilo in ga še vedno ni zadosti"
Zdi se mu razumljivo, da so ljudje ob seznanjanju z velikimi zločini in grozotami ogorčeni, a to se, kot je poudaril, ne sme sprevreči v sovraštvo in maščevalnost. V zadnjih dveh desetletjih so v Sloveniji odkrili več sto večjih ali manjših množičnih grobišč, kar kaže na strahotno razsežnost množičnih pobojev maja in junija leta 1945. Ta odkritja dajejo slutiti vso nečloveškost ravnanja z neoboroženimi ljudmi, o čemer na poseben način priča pred dobrim letom odkriti Barbarin rov v Hudi Jami, je dejal.
V tistem času žal ni bilo prostora za sočutje, je nadaljeval, žal ga pa tudi danes ni v zadostni meri, da bi bila vsa grobišča primerno urejena. "Odkar je Slovenija samostojna in demokratična država, so ta grozljiva dejstva postala široko znana, vendar pa se do njih kot sodobna, demokratična, pravna in etična politična skupnost nismo uspeli ustrezno opredeliti. Dejstvo, da od prve podobne slovesnosti, kakor je naša, mineva že celih dvajset let, ne da bi izpolnili vse naše dolžnosti, je zaskrbljujoče."
Pahor: Nisem ravnodušen do preteklosti
Kratek nagovor na slovesnosti je imel tudi predsednik vlade Borut Pahor. Dejal je, da se je slovesnosti udeležil, ker ni ravnodušen do preteklosti, ne tiste, ki je ovenčana slavo, in ne tiste, ki jo bremenita krivda in greh. Predvsem je prišel zaradi skupne prihodnosti, moralna dolžnost Slovencev pa je, da jo gradijo na tistem, kar je bilo v narodni preteklosti dobrega, pogumnega in pravičnega, in da se izognejo tistemu, kar je bilo slabega, morda strahopetnega in krivičnega, je dejal.
"Na tem mestu so se po vojni dogajale hude, obsojanja vredne in tragične reči, ki jih ne želimo in ne smemo pozabiti. Ničesar iz naše preteklosti ne smemo pozabiti, zlasti če nas navdihuje ali opominja glede naših prihodnjih stremljenj. Tu smo, ker nam ni vseeno ne za preteklost in še zlasti ne za našo skupno prihodnost." Naj se taki usodni časi nikoli več ne vidijo kot priložnost za prevlado ideoloških ciljev nad narodovimi. Naj ne bo več razmer, v katerih bi se iskalo opravičilo za sodelovanje s tujčevo roko ali opravičilo za krvavo maščevanje zmagovalcev nad tem, je dodal.
Pahorju vabilo, Türku ne
Že pred slovesnostjo je Pahor položil venec ob grobišču Jame pod Krenom, zatem pa še k spomeniku pobitim aktivistom Osvobodilne fronte pri Turjaku. Udeležba Pahorja je bila sicer presenetljiva, saj so pristojni v Cerkvi še v sredo pojasnjevali, da na slovesnost niso vabili nikogar iz državnega vrha.
Vendar pa je nato ekonom novomeške škofije Janez Gril pojasnil, da je dobil informacijo, da se Pahor želi udeležiti slovesnosti, zato mu je vabilo tudi poslal. Vabila pa ni prejel predsednik države Danilo Türk, ki je že pred letom tedanjemu predsedniku Slovenske škofovske konference Alojzu Uranu dejal, da bi bilo koristno razmisliti o možnosti primernega javnega dejanja ob 20. obletnici prve spravne slovesnosti.
Prva spravna slovesnost 8. julija 1990
Pred 20 leti, leta 1990, je namreč na tem mestu potekala prva spravna slovesnost, saj grobišče pod Krenom simbolno predstavlja vsa grobišča povojnih pobojev v Sloveniji. Slovesnost je takrat vodil tedanji ljubljanski nadškof metropolit Alojzij Šuštar, državo je predstavljal takratni predsednik predsedstva Milan Kučan, udeležilo pa se je je več kot 30.000 ljudi.
V tej kraški Jami pod Krenom in tudi še v nekaterih breznih na območju Kočevskega roga naj bi ležalo veliko ubitih domobrancev, ki so jih Britanci po vojni vrnili partizanom. Skupaj so predali 11.100 oficirjev in od 500 do 600 civilistov. V breznu pod Krenom je od 4.000 do 5.000 vojakov, ob Slovencih tudi pripadniki drugih narodnosti.
(***) Sunday, May 17, 2009 - Anton the Jesuit
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)